Extracellular Nucleotides in Plants
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Summary:
Growth and development of plant occur under great influence of light,
that quality and quantity changes are received by the specific
photoreceptors. Various photoreceptors perceive the changing light
condition and transform them into a molecular signal that results in
the appropriate response. The photoreceptors of red/far-red light are
phytochromes – the dimeric proteins covalently linked with
phytochromobilin that acts as a chromophore. The decoding process
starts with the perception of red light (666 nm), which occurs through
photoisomerization of a chromophore leading to structural changes in
apoprotein. This form of the phytochrome is called Pfr and is
considered the biologically active form. This change is reversible,
with far-red light (730 nm) illumination restoring Pr form. The
phytochromes are synthesized in their inactive Pr form and are
localized in the cytoplasm. Upon light excitation they are activated
and translocated into the nucleus, where they interact with different
proteins and modulate gene expression. PhyB enters the nucleus in
response to red light, but phyA is efficiently transported into nucleus
in response to far-red light and in response to very law levels of
light over a broad range of colours. Nuclear accumulation of phyA is
dependent on two proteins FHY1 and FHL which preferentially interact
with the light activated form of phyA. Phytochromes, after
translocation into the nucleus, interact with nuclear proteins. To
date, more than 20 phytochrome-interacting proteins have been reported.
Several recent studies have shown that multiple related bHLH (basic
helix-loop-helix) class transcription factors play key
roles in
phytochrome signal transduction. All the bHLH proteins involved in
light signaling belong to a single evolutionarily related subclass.
These bHLH transcription factors are known as PIF (phytochrome
interacting factor) or PIL (phytochrome interacting
factor-like). Some
PIF/PILs preferentially interact with phyB whereas others interact with
equal affinity with both phyB and phyA. Analysis of pif/pil mutants
have led to the suggestion that they mainly act as negative rather than
positive regulators. Because phytochromes can phosphorylate PIF1/PIL5,
PIF3, PIF4, PIF5 and HFR1, it is suggesting that phosphorylated
proteins may then by ubiquitinylated by an E3 ubiquitin ligase, leading
to degradation by the 26S proteasome. Recent studies demonstrated that
several PIF/PIL proteins may interact with DELLA proteins –
the key repressors of gibberellic acid signaling. The DELLA proteins
physically interact with several members of the PIF/PIL family in such
a way that the interaction inhibits the ability of the PIF/PILs to bind
to, and regulate their target genes. Members of the PIF/PIL
transcription factors subclass are involved in phytochrome-regulated
processes such as seed germination, seedling de-etiolation, and
response to shade signals. Light, specifically red light, is a crucial
external factor that induces seed germination. On the other hand, the
plant hormones, gibberellins (GA) and abscisic acid (ABA) are internal
cues that play important but antagonistic roles in seed germination.
Recent research has identified PIF1/PIL5 as a key negative regulator in
phytochrome-mediated seed germination. In the dark, PIF1/PIL5 represses
germination through reducing GA responsiveness and regulating GA and
ABA levels. Light-activated phytochromes directly interact with
PIF1/PIL5 and promote its degradation, negating PIF1/PIL5 repressive
effects. To a postgerminative seedling, light is a decisive
environmental factor that determines its developmental program. In the
dark, a seedling undergoes scotomorphogenesis, however, under light, it
adopts genetic program of photomorphogenesis. Light signals from
phytochromes and cryptochromes converge on a group of conserved
proteins termed COP/DET/FUS, which are central repressors of
photomorphogenesis. In darkness, they work in concert to target a
number of photomorphogenesis-promoting transcription factors, such as
HY5, HYH and LAF1, for degradation. In the dark, PIF/PIL proteins are
active and regulate gene expression to promote scotomorphogenic growth.
Under light, activated phytochromes in their Pfr form, interact with
PIF/PILs and result in the phosphorylation and subsequent degradation
of PIF/PILs by the proteasome, resulting in photomorphogenesis.
Besides, PIF/PIL and HY5 proteins are signaling integrators that link
light signals to the signaling of phytohormones. Phytochromes sense
changes in light quality due to shading by competing vegetation, using
the ratio of red to far-red light (R/FR). PIF4 and PIF5 have recently
been shown to be positive regulators of shade avoidance responses,
participating in the regulation of some key players in these responses,
such as ATHB2, ATHB4 and PIL1, the proteins positively regulating shade
avoidance, and HFR1, a transcription factor with a negative role in
shade avoidance. Responses to low R/FR ratio are primarily mediated by
phyB. In daylight, phyB exists predominantly in the Pfr form, and
following import into the nucleus, Pfr B binds PIF4 and PIF5 proteins,
resulting in their degradation via the 25S proteasome. In vegetational
shade, a reduction in R/FR ratio results in conversion of phyB to the
inactive Pr form. The reduction in phyB Pfr would therefore result in
increased abundance of nuclear PIF4 and PIF5 proteins.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Insect Peptide Hormones – a Review of Major Families
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Histone H1.2 – Member of Linker Histones with Apoptosis Marker Function
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Mitochondrial Failure in Cell Transformation
Key words: cancer, molecular marker, mitochondria, MtDNA mutation, mtDNA polymorphism, Evidence Based Medicine – EBM
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Calmodulin and Calmodulin-Related Proteins in Plants
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Summary: In the course of its evolution,
plants have developed various mechanisms that act on the local and
systemic levels and which role is to adapt plants to the environment
they live in. One of these mechanisms is widely recognized plant
defense system directed against biotic factors, to which belongs, among
the others, pathogen attack. The first line of the defense against
pathogen attack is so called structural constitutive resistance
determined by plant anatomical structure and chemical constitutive
resistance consisting of unfavorable effect of plant secondary
metabolites against the pathogens. Epidermis and periderm play a main
role in structural constitutive defense. Layers and waxes are present
in epidermis and there are trichomes and thorns on its surface, and on
the surface of roots – hairy roots. Cell wall itself is also
a very important structural barrier. Lack of the continuity of
epidermis, caused by wounding or the presence of the natural openings
(stomata, spiracles and hydathodes that are the potential places of the
pathogen attack), enables pathogens to overcome the first line of
defense. Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and induced systemic
resistance (ISR) constitute the second line of plant defense system.
Induced systemic resistance has been studied in respect of mechanism of
its development and in respect of signaling pathways that transmit the
ISR signal to distant plant tissues and organs. The main reason of
research, however, is prospect to exploit this phenomenon as the plant
protection system against pathogens. Utilization of ISR in agriculture
could possibly at least significantly decrease the amount of chemical
pesticides. The largest group among plant pathogens is fungal
pathogens, mainly necrotrophic fungi including grey fungus –
Botrytis cinerea,
Fusarium oxysporum, Alternaria species and pathogenic
oomycetes – Phytophthora
infestans. B.
cinerea infection
causes grey mold disease, seedling blight and the death of stem in many
plant species – in pot plants and crops as well as in conifer
and broadleaved trees and shrubs. Fungi of Alternaria genus
cause
potato or tomato alternariosis, blight of tomato seedlings and infest
vegetables and black spot disease in crucifers. Fusarium
wilt
caused by F. oxysporum
is the most destructive disease
of potato and tomato, while P. infestans
causes potato blight. Necrotrophic fungi can infect living
tissues, but their development and reproduction take place only on
death tissue. Necrotrophic fungi secrete specific enzymes and
mycotoxins during the penetration of host tissues. These substances
cause the death of host cells and enable pathogen to feed in the host`s
death tissue. Plant diseases caused by described above necrotrophic
fungi are very often epidemic, and lead to destruction of
entire field causing significant yield losses in agriculture,
horticulture and fruit farming. Plant protection against infection of
necrotrophic fungi is currently based on keeping the
agrotechnical rules regarding soil quality, term of planting, use of
fertilizers and chemical protection. At the beginning of 90`
last century it has been reported on ISR induction by
inoculation of cucumber rhizosphere with bacteria of
Pseudomonas
genus against Colletotrichum
orbiculare, that causes
anthracnose in cucumbers. Further research has shown, that this kind of
resistance was induced by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR),
which colonizing plant roots promote plant growth, rhizoremediation and
soil fertilization (Azospirillum,
Herbaspirillum, Enterobacter,
Acetobacter, Azotobater i Pseudomonas). On the other hand
it reduced
disease symptoms caused by pathogens and herbivorous insects (Bacillus,
Pseudomonas i Serattia). In this paper, we describe
molecular
mechanisms of ISR induced against necrotrophic fungal pathogens in a
light of the current results of research. We provide also examples of
ISR induction by nonpathogenic Pseudomonas
strains that belong to PGPR.
Selected Pseudomonas
factors responsible for ISR induction have been
divided into direct and indirect factors. Direct factors constitute a
competition for iron and antibiotics production and indirect
factors bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS), Pseudomonas
metabolites massetolide A, N-alkylated benzylamine derivative (NABA)
and N-acyl-L-homoserine lactone (AHL).
Keywords: induced systemic resistance,
necrotrophic fungi, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, Pseudomonas
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Lactadherin – Small Protein with big Potential
Summary: Lactadherin (also known as milk fat globule factor 8, MFG-F8) is a 47 kDa glycoprotein that was found in milk fat globule membranes. Lactadherin is secreted into milk by mammary epithelial cells of humans, cows and mice. Its presence in milk is associated with protecting a breast-fed children against rotavirus infections. The protein is also produced by vascular smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells and macrophages. Lactadherin at the N-terminal part has an EGF-like domain (epidermal growth factor-like domain) enabling its binding to aVb5 and aVb3 integrins and at the C-terminus has a C2 domain responsible for a stereospecific binding to phosphatidyl-L-serine (PS). The presence of such structures determines multiple physiological functions of this protein. Lactadherin secreted by macrophages promotes the phagocytosis of apoptotic particles by forming a bridges between PS on apoptotic cells and aVb3 integrins on phagocytes. Lactadherin deficiency leads to accumulation of apoptotic cell debris in subendothelium and thus alters the protective immunologic response which leads to an acceleration of atherosclerotic plaque development. Lactadherin may also play a role in the clearance of PS-expressing platelet derived microparticles from the circulation thus reducing hypercoagulable state. PS binding C2 domain oflactadherin shares homology with the C2 domains of blood coagulation factor VIII and factor V. Due to its relatively low molecular weight and resistance to digest lactadherin may serve as an easy bioavailable molecule with high potency to inhibit (competitively) factors VIII and V binding with PS-expressing platelets, platelet derived microparticles or erythrocytes and thus reduce formation of procoagulant tenase and prothrombinase complexes. Lactadherin exhibits a great similarity to annexin V. However, in contrast to annexin V, lactadherin binds to the membranes at much lower PS concentration and in the absence of calcium. This review presents evidence supporting these novel roles of lactadherin.![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The NF-kB-dependent Cellular Signaling Pathway and its Interference with p53 and HSF1-dependent Pathways
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Role of Melatonin in Breast, Ovarian and Endometrial Cancers
Key words: melatonin, melatonin receptors, estrogen, estrogen receptors, aromatase, estrogen-dependent cancers, breast cancer, ovary cancer, endometrial cancer
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |